top of page

Navigating ICT Compliance: EU DORA vs. UK Operational Resilience Regulation

Updated: Nov 4


DORA vs. Operational Resilience Regulation

The Q1 2025 is an important milestone in the financial landscape across Europe for the financial institutions, both in continental Europe and in the UK.


Two major regulations are kicking off. The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) in the European Union on January 17th and the Operational Resilience Regulation in the UK on March 31st. Although both frameworks aim at strengthening the operational resilience of financial services, they have some significant differences in scope.


DORA is focused specifically on digital operational resilience, targeting ICT risks and third-party service providers, while the UK’s framework takes a broader view of operational resilience that includes both digital and non-digital disruptions.

 

Digital Operational Resilience Act, EU

Operational Resilience Regulation, UK

Who has to comply

  • Banks and Credit Institutions

  • Investment Firms

  • Payment Institutions

  • Asset Management Companies (including UCITS and AIFMs)

  • Crypto-Asset Service Providers

  • Payment and E-money Institutions

  • Crowdfunding Service Providers

  • Central Securities Depositories

  • Central Counterparties

  • Insurance and Reinsurance Companies

  • Trading Venues

  • Banks 

  • Building societies 

  • PRA-designated investment firms 

  • Insurers 

  • Recognised Investment Exchanges 

  • Enhanced scope Senior Managers

  • Certification Regime firms and entities authorised and registered under the Payment Services Regulations 2017 and Electronic Money Regulations 2011.

Goal and Coverage

  • The regulation aims to strengthen the digital operational resilience of financial entities. Its primary objective is to ensure that these entities can withstand, respond to, and recover from ICT-related disruptions, such as cyberattacks, system failures, and data breaches.

  • It establishes a unified regulatory framework for managing ICT risks, enhancing the security and stability of the financial system, and ensuring that both financial institutions and their third-party ICT service providers are better prepared for digital threats.

  • It has a broader focus than DORA, encompassing the resilience of critical business services, with a strong emphasis on ensuring that firms can continue to provide these services even during disruptions.

  • The UK’s approach is not limited to digital resilience but looks at operational resilience in a more holistic way, considering non-digital disruptions such as supply chain issues, third-party outages, and physical threats (e.g., pandemics, natural disasters).

Key Components

  • ICT Risk Management:  Requires firms to have robust processes for managing ICT-related risks.

  • Incident Reporting: Sets out a framework for reporting significant ICT incidents to regulators.

  • Digital Resilience Testing: Firms must regularly test their digital operational resilience through assessments and simulations.

  • Third-Party Risk Management: Obligatory management of risks related to outsourcing, particularly critical ICT providers, including remediation of the contractual arrangements for third-party ICT services.

  • Information Sharing: Encourages information sharing between financial institutions and regulators to improve cybersecurity practices.

  • Impact Tolerances: Firms must set impact tolerances for important business services—essentially thresholds for acceptable levels of disruption.

  • Mapping and Testing: Firms are required to map the resources supporting critical business services and conduct regular testing to ensure these services can continue during disruptions.

  • Scenario Testing: Firms must use a range of scenarios to test their operational resilience, not only focusing on ICT but also physical and other business disruptions.

Responsibility

  • Noncompliant entities can be fined up to 1% of average daily worldwide turnover in the preceding fiscal year. This fine can be levied every day until the financial entity achieves compliance.

  • Entities found to be in violation of DORA requirements may face fines of up to 2% of total annual worldwide turnover or a maximum fine of €10m.

  • In some jurisdictions, senior management, including board members, can be held personally accountable with a maximum fine of €5m.

  • FCA fines for operational resilience breaches can range from £10m to £50m or more, depending on the impact of the breach.

  • Senior Management Responsibility: The UK framework places heavy emphasis on governance, with senior managers being directly accountable for operational resilience.

    • Executives could face temporary or permanent disqualification from holding senior roles within regulated firms.

    • The FCA may fine senior managers up to £1m or more for significant misconduct or failure to take reasonable steps to prevent non-compliance.

Please contact us to arrange a call and discuss your company's DORA relevant needs and compliance risks.


Email for more info on DORA compliance


Follow us to know more about DORA compliance

Subscribe to our news to know more on DORA compliance


Comentarios


FollowUs_Small.png
EmailUs_Small.png
Subscribe_Small2.png
bottom of page